|
The New York
Times - July 3, 2004
By Edward Wong
BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 2, With the chaos of the occupation and now the loosening
of American control here, Iran has moved into its best position in decades
to influence the political shape of Iraq, Western and Iraqi officials
say.
Already,
the Iranian government has quietly strengthened its presence in Iraq by
providing financial backing to a range of popular Shiite Muslim groups
and by flooding the country with intelligence agents, the officials say.
Movement
across the 900-mile border is much freer than under the rule of Saddam
Hussein, as evidenced by the droves of Iranian pilgrims flocking to the
Shiite holy cities of southern Iraq and the daily smuggling of goods and
people.
Most worrisome
to American officials are Iran's close ties to powerful Shiite clerics
like Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who was born in Iran, and Moktada
al-Sadr, who led a fierce rebellion against American forces for nearly
three months this spring. American officials believe that Iran might have
partly financed Mr. Sadr's movement.
Though Shiites
are a majority in both nations, Iraqis are torn between religious and
national loyalties. Just how much sway Iran will exert over a new Iraq
is far from clear. But some warn that Iran, the world's dominant seat
of Shiite Islam, could be the silent power broker as Iraq heads toward
elections in January.
Iran's aim, Iraqi and Western officials say, is to shape an Iraq run by
religious Shiite politicians who could serve as proxies of the clerics
in both countries.
"They
want a failure of America in Iraq, but they hope the country will be stable
enough not to destabilize Iran," said a Western diplomat in Baghdad
with extensive experience in the region. "The best thing for them
would be a stabilized Iraq with a friendly Shia power in Baghdad created
in opposition to the occupation forces."
With the
toppling of Mr. Hussein's secular dictatorship, competition for the heart
of Shiite Islam in the region has broken open. For American policy makers,
one of the greatest fears has long been an Iraq ruled by Shiites vulnerable
to Iranian influence. That was one reason the United States did not support
a Shiite rebellion after the 1991 Persian Gulf war.
The White
House now hopes that secular-minded Shiites like Iyad Allawi, the interim
prime minister, will govern a democratic Iraq that will in turn transform
Iran, which President Bush included in the "axis of evil" with
Iraq and North Korea.
Since the
American invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the Western diplomat said,
the Iranians "have the feeling that they're surrounded by Americans
or friends of the Americans."
Some experts
say Iran's seizure in June of three small British Navy boats on the Shatt
al Arab waterway between Iraq and Iran was in part a petty but prominent
way for Iran to emphasize that its interests in the region would not be
ignored.
Iran has
expressed both hostility toward and guarded acceptance of the interim
Iraqi government, reflecting the internal battles in Iran's own leadership.
For years, the two major camps in the Iranian government the reformers
led by President Mohammad Khatami and the hard-liners who follow Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini have pursued separate foreign policies.
But many
Iraqis already suspect Iran of wielding enormous influence over the most
prominent Shiite political parties here. A poll conducted in May for the
Coalition Provisional Authority showed that the most popular political
and religious leaders in Iraq were Shiites with strong Iranian ties.
"It
seems clear that the Iranians are trying to butter both sides of the bread
and all four crust edges," said Prof. Juan Cole, an expert on Shiite
Islam at the University of Michigan.
The Shiite
parties contend that they remain independent of the Iranian government,
but also point out that Iran was the only country willing to harbor them
in exile during Mr. Hussein's rule, and so it is not surprising that their
ties to Iran remain strong.
At the same
time, Iranian meddling is not without its risks. As many as half a million
Iraqis died in the eight-year war with Iran in the 1980's, and the wounds
and hostilities linger. When ordinary Iraqis talk about bombings and assassinations
here, they often blame Iranian agents after pointing the finger at the
United States and Israel.
Partly because
of those sentiments, Shiite parties once exiled in Iran under Mr. Hussein
most notably the Dawa Islamic Party and the Supreme Council for
the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, known as Sciri contend that they
no longer have direct ties to their former host, despite a history of
generous financial support from Iran's government.
Officials
here and in Washington say otherwise.
A senior
American military official said in an e-mail message that the United States
Army has observed "a large amount of U.S. currency being passed by
Iran" to Sciri, which was founded in 1982 by an Iraqi ayatollah exiled
in Iran. The money was exchanged for "the supposed purpose of paying
salaries and maintenance of vehicles and facilities," the official
said.
Humam Bakr
Hamody, a senior Sciri official, played down the link. "Sciri is
not related to the Iranian government and has different positions and
opinions," he said.
The party
had received money from sources in many Middle Eastern countries, including
Iran, he added, and the funds had come from individual donors rather than
governments. Money is delivered to the party over the Iranian border because
there is no reliable way to wire money to Iraq, he said.
A senior
Iraqi Shiite official familiar with the security situation here confirmed
that financial transactions were taking place between Iran and various
Shiite parties. Those include the militia led by Mr. Sadr, the 31-year-old
Shiite cleric who is more popular than ever in Iraq after leading his
spring rebellion against the occupation forces.
The American
military, seeking to avoid street-to-street fighting in Najaf, a city
held sacred by Shiites for its shrines, has backed down from its promise
to kill or capture Mr. Sadr.
American
soldiers seized large stashes of Iranian currency during arrests of Mr.
Sadr's aides, an American military official said. But it was unclear whether
that indicated direct involvement by the Iranian government in the insurgency.
In May, when
anti-American fighting peaked in the city of Kufa, the main mosque there,
a Sadr stronghold, broadcast pleas for blood donations in both Arabic
and Persian, the language of Iran. At the time, Iranian pilgrimages to
the city had dried up, and the calls for aid in Persian fueled suspicions
that Iranian fighters had joined Mr. Sadr's militia.
A resident
of Kufa said in an interview at the time of the uprisings that he opened
his door one day to find two Persian-speaking militiamen setting up a
mortar outside.
Mr. Sadr
has been open about his allegiance to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the
leader of Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution. Last month, a Sadr aide said
in a sermon at the Kufa mosque that Mr. Sadr "promises God and Muslim
countries" that he will "keep following Khomeini" as long
as he lives. One of the most zealous units of Mr. Sadr's militia is named
after Ayatollah Khomeini.
Mr. Sadr's fealty to the late ayatollah stems from long family ties across
the border and a history of adversity under Mr. Hussein's rule.
His patron, Ayatollah Kazem al-Haeri, still lives in the Iranian city
of Qum, arguably the foremost seat of Shiite theocratic learning. The
offices of both clerics in Najaf acknowledged that Mr. Sadr operated as
his patron's spiritual representative in Iraq and that substantial money
flowed between them.
Mr. Sadr's deceased uncle, Muhammad Bakr al-Sadr, one of the last century's
most respected Shiite thinkers, was close friends with Ayatollah Khomeini
and took an active role in Iraqi politics by opposing the ruling Baath
Party. Mr. Hussein had him killed in 1980.
Mr. Hussein also ordered the killing of Muhammad Sadiq al-Sadr, the father
of Moktada, who before his death in 1999 named as his successor Ayatollah
Haeri. The ayatollah's office in Qum has organized donations for Moktada
al-Sadr and his militia, the Mahdi Army.
Despite indications of Iranian support for Mr. Sadr, prominent Iranians
appeared wary when he led his followers to open rebellion, with its potential
of destabilizing Iraq. In late April, as Mr. Sadr was urging the militia
on in its attacks against the Americans, Ayatollah Haeri issued a statement
saying he did not support the actions.
In mid-April, Iran sent envoys to Najaf in what it said was an attempt
to negotiate an end to Mr. Sadr's insurgency, possibly because the fighting
was jeopardizing American plans eventually to hand power to Shiite parties.
An Iranian diplomat was assassinated in Baghdad at the time, and senior
American officials said they did not want Iran interfering in Iraq.
Iran said the "iron fist policy" of the United States had led
to the delegation's failure. At a recent sermon in the golden-domed Shrine
of Ali in Najaf, a leader of Sciri, Sadr al-Din al-Kubanchi, criticized
the Iranian government for not reining in the mercurial Mr. Sadr.
The single most powerful cleric in Iraq remains Ayatollah Sistani, a 73-year-old
Iranian who moved to Najaf in his early 20's. In the 1990's, his organization
began making substantial financial contributions to clerics in Iran, which
brought him closer to the top religious leaders there.
But Ayatollah Sistani's relationship with Iran's mullahs is not necessarily
one of subservience or even ideological allegiance. The pipeline of money
flows both ways, and associates say the ayatollah receives donations gathered
by his Qum office.
Ayatollah Sistani's mentor in Najaf, Grand Ayatollah Abu al-Qassim al-Khoei,
promoted the "quietist" school of Shiite Islam, which advocated
that religious leaders remove themselves from direct involvement in politics
a view that ran counter to that of Ayatollah Khomeini.
Close associates of Ayatollah Sistani have said he is intent on transforming
Najaf into a Shiite power center to rival Qum, which was strengthened
in the 1980's by an influx of clerics fleeing Najaf during Mr. Hussein's
rule.
Iran's influence can be felt even beyond its direct ties to Iraq's clerics,
religious parties and the strongly Shiite south.
Iran is suspected of having close ties to Ahmad Chalabi, the former exile
and secular Shiite politician once backed by the Pentagon.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has opened an investigation into charges
by American intelligence officials that Mr. Chalabi told Iranian officials
that the Americans had broken a code used by Iran. Mr. Chalabi has denied
the charges.
In northern Iraq, Maj. Gen. John R. S. Batiste, commander of the First
Infantry Division, said, "There has definitely been an effect from
Iran since we've been here." The general declined to provide details.
Another senior American military official said Iranian intelligence agents
were operating in the division's command area, which is slightly larger
than West Virginia and shares a long border with Iran.
In February, before Iranian pilgrims flooded into Iraq for the Shiite
festival of Ashura, American military officials said they were monitoring
Iranian intelligence agents working out of central Baghdad.
"Iran is the regional hegemon," the senior military official
said. "They're trying to set the stage for the Shia to take power."Nazila
Fathi contributed reporting from Tehran for this article.
|